Size comparison of FE 4/2470 on A7 vs Olympus 12-40 f2.8 on GX7

Started Feb 6, 2014 | Discussions thread
forpetessake Veteran Member • Posts: 4,892
Re: apples and oranges

viking79 wrote:

forpetessake wrote:

viking79 wrote:

I think ease of design has more to do with field of view and entrance pupil size (focal length / f-number). The easiest lens designs I have seen which are very good are large format lenses. They are very simple lenses and don't need very high resolution (since the sensor size, film, is measured in inches).

I think in general smaller sensors are harder to design lenses for, as you have to start getting excellent performance at very large apertures to make them any good.

Very true. If equivalent lenses had the same or lower production cost/spec then smaller sensors were the winners. But the reality is that by increasing the sensor size the production cost/spec for equivalent lenses goes down. I wounder how much would an equivalent 12-35mm f/2 m43 lens cost and weigh, especially if the requirements were at least 80-100 lpmm in the center and 70-90 in the edges to match the Sony lens.

Olympus actually made one for 4/3 SLR cameras, 14-35mm f/2 lens, and it is still available and about $2300 US.

Now, it might or might not be a better lens than the CZ 24-70mm f/4, but it also costs twice as much for comparable entrance pupil size and field of view range.


Ecellent! So these two are the closest equivalent lenses:

Olympus 14-35mm f/2; weight: 900g; dimensions: Ø86 x 123mm; B&H price: $2299

Sony 24-70mm f/4; weight: 426g; dimensions: 73 x 95mm; B&H Price: $1198

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow