Is m4/3 stagnant?

Started Feb 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
SirSeth
SirSeth Veteran Member • Posts: 9,889
Your preferences don't make the sky blue.
2

You have a triple system (or quad)---Dude!---who doesn't want be in the same position!? It sounds like you can buy what you want so if you don't prefer current 4/3rds offerings, cool, but it's a preference, not a personal insult and not a sign of stagnation or lackluster performance.

Personally, I think if you like the results you achieve from your Sonys and have a thing for ultra thin DOF and gobs of MP, you should try the A7. Doing so would not mean that Micro4/3rds is stagnating.

Consider the E-M1 which garnered more than a third of 30,000 votes easily win product of the year. Looks like Micro4/3rds is doing very well even if they are not doing everything to suite your specific needs. My guess is that Panasonic will continue to kill in the video market. They are said to be releasing a new high end camera this week.

Cheers,

Seth

-- hide signature --

What if the hokey pokey really is what it's all about?
--
wallygoots.smugmug.com
wallygoots.blogspot.com

 SirSeth's gear list:SirSeth's gear list
Olympus E-1 Sony Alpha a7 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Olympus Zuiko Digital 11-22mm 1:2.8-3.5 Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 OSS +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow