Is m4/3 stagnant?

Started Feb 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
dgrogers Veteran Member • Posts: 7,079
Re: Is m4/3 stagnant?

Lumixdude wrote:

the Panasonic 35-100 really isn't that expensive at $600 for what it does... You need less lenses for Micro Four Thirds and there is good lenses in every focal length. You can build a complete kit with Micro Four Thirds pretty much with three lenses. You're looking at a Sigma lens that costs over $1000 to get something similar in full frame or APS-C. What's more is that 16megapixel Micro Four Thirds cameras have better IQ than everything Canon offers and most of the Nikon mid range APS-C gear, as well as Sony up to the A900.

I don't know what you are complaining about?

Where did you find a 35-100 for $600?

-- hide signature --

Completely infatuated with the "OMG"

 dgrogers's gear list:dgrogers's gear list
Olympus E-1 Samsung NX20 Olympus OM-D E-M10
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow