Is m4/3 stagnant?

Started Feb 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
Lumixdude Senior Member • Posts: 2,782
Re: Is m4/3 stagnant?

Yep... If you've got the original lenses from more than 3 years ago then that there alone is half the problem. The newer versions are much better... Panasonic and Olympus made this a matter of resolving this over the last 2 years or so now so that may be half your problem.

There is something for everyone with Micro Four Thirds, most people will only really need 3 lenses or so in their kit. The only caveat is the lack of zooms well and truly beyond ridiculous in the 100-300 and above. But quite frankly, if you want more than 600mm zoom you've gone a little bit nuts.

The one issue and the only issue that made me consider other options than Micro Four Thirds is that your ISO performance sucks above 1600. That's it... Which can be completely ameliorated by simply buying faster lenses.

 Lumixdude's gear list:Lumixdude's gear list
Olympus PEN E-PL5 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm F4-5.6 OIS Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm 1:3.5-5.6 II R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm 1:2 Apple iPhone 4 +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow