14mm 2.5 vs 17mm 1.8

Started Jan 31, 2014 | Discussions thread
OP tamras29 Regular Member • Posts: 445
Re: 14mm 2.5 vs 17mm 1.8

spotfromoz wrote:

tamras29 wrote:

FrankS009 wrote:

Lenstip did reviews of both lenses, and the 14mm 2.5 is both considerably sharper than the 17mm and less expensive. Purple fringing can be controlled on Olympus cameras with a strong UV filter.


That being said, I agree that sharpness is not the only thing to consider. But it helps.

I am another looking forward to the PL 15mm.


-- hide signature --

When no-one else is there, the camera becomes my means...to say to a wider audience, "Did you see that?" David duChemin

Looks impressive, unfortunately not made in 46mm for some reason!

A quick Google will find many 46mm uv filters from a number of manufacturers.

Would you mind very much pointing me at one? Lots of Haze 1A's in 46mm but I can't find a 2A which was advised.

Is perhaps UV(C) the same thing?

 tamras29's gear list:tamras29's gear list
Ricoh Caplio GX100 Fujifilm X-E2 Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow