So why don't people ever talk about the 4/3 aspect ratio?

Started Jan 28, 2014 | Discussions thread
MatsP
MatsP Senior Member • Posts: 2,284
Re: So why don't people ever talk about the 4/3 aspect ratio?
1

Go to a art museum and take a look at the pictures there. You'll find very few are 3:2, many wiill be close to 4:3 or even more square. Look at classic film cameras as Hasselblad and Rolleiflex. They were 1:1 (6x6cm). Look at today's professional MF cameras like Hasselblad, Phase One and Pentax. They all are 4:3 (44x33mm). So 3:2 is indeed not the only traditional aspect rate among cameras. It's origin is Leica which was using movie film in a stills camera and put two film frames together to one picture. And the Kodak Brownie which also was 2:3 (6x9cm) at the other end of the quality span.

 MatsP's gear list:MatsP's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Olympus OM-D E-M5 Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow