So why don't people ever talk about the 4/3 aspect ratio?

Started Jan 28, 2014 | Discussions thread
Hen3ry Forum Pro • Posts: 18,218
Haven't you noticed? We are offered three or four formats …

… and we use them.

I work mainly in 3:2, also in 16:9 for some stuff -- particularly landscapes, and 4:3 for some other stuff, particularly portraits in vertical orientation.

Square is also there, of course. I don't use it except by accident.

Before 35mm (i.e. FF), roll film cameras ruled. They were 1:1 (e.g. 6x6cm), 4:3 (e.g. 6x4.5) or 3:2 (i.e. 9x6 cm).

Most pix were printed on 10X8" paper for all kinds of uses , which is 4:5 format.

Cheers, geoff

-- hide signature --

Geoffrey Heard
Down and out in Rabaul in the South Pacific

 Hen3ry's gear list:Hen3ry's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic G85 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 45-175mm F4.0-5.6 ASPH OIS +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow