AF tunning what actually happens?????

Started Jan 24, 2014 | Discussions thread
Horshack Veteran Member • Posts: 6,137
Re: AF tunning what actually happens?????

Roy Kikuta wrote:

Horshack wrote:

Roy Kikuta wrote:

Do you have more details - for example, how does the AF module/CPU communicate with the "silent wave" (ultrasonic?) focusing system in an AF-S lens? Since AF-S lenses contain CPU's, I assume the AF module in the body communicates digitally with the CPU in the lens - has anybody hacked the lens CPU or signal to actually understand what's going on? Is the fine tune "correction" applied during the phase detection/calculation, or is it applied in the signal sent to the lens - stated another way, is the fine tune "correction" applied in the body's AF module - or is it actually executed by the lens CPU? I've heard that only one lens drive command is applied - with no secondary phase check(s)/lens drive command(s) applied - in order to speed up AF operations - is this true? I'm not criticizing your explanation - I'm simply looking for more details because it's a subject that's dear to my heart

Evidence strongly suggests that fine tuning affects only the phase detection part of the process and does not alter the commands sent to the lens. The first piece of evidence is WilbaW's excellent articledescribing how PDAF is a partially closed-looped system that relies on multiple phase sensing:lens movement such a system you can't reliably alter the outcome by biasing an input. The second piece of evidence is that a body+lens can be accurately tuned without ever engaging the AF motor (DotTune), with some background information here.

Nikon's own description seems to imply that only a single lens drive command is applied - especially in AFS mode. Even in AFC mode, I get the impression that multiple phase detect/lens movement processes are done ONLY when movement is detected. To put it crudely - the phase detect module calculates what direction and how much to move the lens to achieve focus - then issues a single drive command - and once the lens movement is done, a confirmation signal is sent to the body - which we see as the green AF confirmation dot in the VF. Unfortunately, there appears to be no subsequent phase detection to confirm that precise AF has in fact been achieved. My understanding is that the AF-S "motor" inside lenses are a form of linear piezoelectric (ultrasonic) drive motors - where a voltage signal excites the crystal which in turn causes lens (group) elements to move a certain distance and direction. Surely, there must be a difference in how much lens movement is generated by a given drive signal depending on whether I happen to have the lens/body in a vertical position when shooting BIF's going overhead - as opposed to shooting a bird on the ground with lens/body in the horizontal position? What happens with older AF-S lenses as lubricants deteriorate - in time, a given drive signal will result in smaller movement as friction increases? It seems a rather haphazard way to achieve precision AF (i.e., not using a closed loop feedback system) - I assume that Nikon has done a lot of testing over the years, and concluded that the single drive AF works "good enough" - and necessary in order to achieve 10~12 FPS in the pro bodies. A lot of guesses and (half-baked?) assumptions on my part - I just wish I had more definitive info. I'm not a Canon user and don't visit their Forums - I wonder if AF is also a significant discussion item there as well?

I don't see anything in Nikon's article which implies a single movement - just some phrasing limited for the sake of the article's brevity. You seemed convinced that PDAF uses a single motion. It doesn't. I'd suggest performing your own experiments to settle the matter to your satisfaction. WilbaW describes some good experiments you can try in his article.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow