Irrational views on SLT part duex

Started Jan 22, 2014 | Discussions thread
nandbytes Senior Member • Posts: 5,950
Re: Other Reading, ISO-Less

William Curtindale wrote:

Oh my gosh, I have been left out in the woods on this one. In the past I have briefly read post by Nordstjermen on the subject but did not think too much about it (my loss).

After reading and seeing all the push back, consternation and frustration in this thread I went out and googled "ISO-Less Sensor". Oh my gosh, this is real and I should understand it (how I use it is another thing).

It is obvious there are some very knowledgeable members in this forum (so Thanks for the lessons and enlightening on the subject - many of us can learn from this).

Below are three links I found to be interesting (the 3rd article bothers me a little because of how the author defines exposure relative to ISO-Less sensor) :




Finally, I think I now understand. I have an ISO-Less camera.

Thanks Nordstjermen

-- hide signature --

A99, A900, A700, R1 w/Zeiss + Sony G Glass

This doesn't directly relate to my reply but thanks for posting. I knew that stuff anyway in a crude sense. We experimented with this kind of stuff at university.

Was a nice refresher

 nandbytes's gear list:nandbytes's gear list
Sony RX100 III Sony Alpha NEX-5N Sony Alpha a7 Sony Alpha a7R II Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow