Irrational views on SLT part duex

Started Jan 22, 2014 | Discussions thread
sybersitizen Veteran Member • Posts: 9,726
Re: Is your mind open or not?

Shield3 wrote:

sybersitizen wrote:

Shield3 wrote:

If it were truly "ISO-less" then the results shouldn't change based on exposure time.

You do not yet understand the term 'ISO-less'. That's okay, you will.

No such thing. ISO matters. Again, for it to be true, the inverse would have to be true. IE a shot properly exposed for ISO 100 then taken @ ISO 6400. Good luck getting all those highlights back that you just blew out. Not to mention that cameras are ELECTRONIC devices, and gain/ISO does add noise, reduce midtones, lower dynamic range.

For a "true" ISO-less camera the SNR and dynamic range chart would have to be linear; they're not. Even in the shots above I see vast differences; the shadow detail is gone when you underexpose by 6! stops just like the highlights are gone when you UNDERexpose by 6.

Stop drinking the cool-aid and use your eyes and your logic. You'll get it.

Okay, you're just being dumb, and I don't care what you choose to believe. Bye now.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow