Buying new camera (set) and choice between two m4/3 and FF

Started Jan 16, 2014 | Questions thread
Sergey_Green Forum Pro • Posts: 11,380
As an example ..

Melbourne Park wrote:

While you are right perhaps, its not that simple.

For instance, portraiture is traditionally 85mm to 135mm.

As an example, the Nikor 135 F/2.0 lens.

You Pay:$1,299.00

It also lacks image stabilisation.

And it beats every lens you can ever have for mFT. And if it is too expensive then there is always 85/1.8 for a fraction of the DC lens price.

Its depth of field is not much different to Olympus's F/1.8 (=> F/3.6mm) because the Olympus lens is longer. Using very bright lenses on FF is not easy, because one can very easily loose clarity on your subject at full aperture.

There is a discussion still on the front page just about that. With this page for start,

And add in more than one person, and the edge clarity becomes an issue, which is an FF problem. Normally improved by stepping down ...

For example,

Big problem!

-- hide signature --

- sergey

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow