Buying new camera (set) and choice between two m4/3 and FF

Started Jan 16, 2014 | Questions thread
Sergey_Green Forum Pro • Posts: 11,537
Why not ;) ?

dgnelson wrote:

Sergey_Green wrote:

Mk82 wrote:

1) I do lots of macros (1:1-9:1 scales!) and close-up photos 1:2-1:4) with my E-520


Why FF? Shallow depth of field is a disadvantage.

You decide what is interesting in your will-be image, and device how to bring the eye of the viewer directly to it. All there is to it. There is hardly a need to go past f/11 with FF setup I have done so far.

Your needs (if they are not only theoretical) may be different, but I see closeups ruined by deep DoF just as often as they can be disadvantaged by the shallower plane of focus.

2) I take lots of landscape and environment photographs


Why is it more FF more important for landscape than other kinds of photography?

Not sure I understand your question, but if you mean to ask why FF is a better choice for landscape photography, then it is simple; more dr, more detail, and easier to push the files around. If it all matters to you of course, or portability alone is not the first mark on your list.

-- hide signature --

- sergey

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow