Olympus 25mm f/1.8 images and price

Started Jan 16, 2014 | Discussions thread
Pic Man Senior Member • Posts: 1,310
Re: Olympus 25mm f/1.8 images and price

Jim Salvas wrote:

tt321 wrote:

Jim Salvas wrote:

I don't get why the 45 is considered such a bargain. It covers a much smaller image circle than a FF nifty-fifty, but costs three times as much.

Mount a larger, heavier 50mm from FF onto your M43 body and you get drastically worse quality than the 45, then realize that 200 pounds they want for it represent fantastic value.

Actually, I've done that and the quality was quite good. Remember, with a FF lens on an MFT body, you're only using the center of the lens, the sharpest part. If the lens was made for digital, it will do just fine on MFT. The downside is no AF.

-- hide signature --

Jim Salvas

Maybe it's not MFT that is expensive but the nifty fifty's of canon and nikon that are cheap. It wouldn't surprise me if canon/nikon use these types of lenses to get people to buy into the system. They might not even make any profit on them. Canon/Nikon have making DSLR's for a long time and have a much bigger market share so they probably benefit more from economies of scale.  I also imagine there R&D costs are less. The cost of the raw materials is not the only thing that goes into the price.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow