Nikon D3300 is $499 - how can mirrorless compete?

Started Jan 7, 2014 | Discussions thread
phazelag Veteran Member • Posts: 3,235
Yes if the buyers are new and uneducated wrote:

Or do we just have a bumper crop of smart alecks this year?

Yes there are apples and pumpkins out there.

For a person who becomes interested in photography, there are many choices.

A buyer gets a lot of capability for a low price from an intro DSLR for the same weight.

Image quality wise there is nothing wrong with a D3300.

A $500 DSLR is practically disposable. My D3X has depreciated $1000 a year.

While I have an EM1 and an EM5, I think a lot of folks would pick the DSLR.

I'm just speculating, of course, but those of you who seem to know it all could just compare sales figures and see how MFT compares with DSLR.


Most people on here who own M43 are tired of heavy glass.  ITs not the bodies, its the glass.

-- hide signature --
 phazelag's gear list:phazelag's gear list
Sony RX100 III Panasonic FZ1000 Canon G9 X II Canon EOS M50 Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow