Sony 35mm 1.8 vs 18-135mm for A65.

Started Jan 4, 2014 | Discussions thread
AlphaTikal Senior Member • Posts: 2,140
just a tip to above: maybe superzoom is for you

We live in a world full of compromises. Even if such a lens like 16-300mm would exist, it would be big, heavy and expensice and on top of that, the quality wouldn't be good. I can understand that you dont want to switch lenses, but that is one of the reason why interchangeable lens cameras are made for.

Maybe a fixed lens camera with smaller sensor is for you? You could use both cameras. The DSLR for special needs like low light or macro and regular stuff with a superzoom camera. It even does not cost more than a lens. In example DSC-HX300 with aps-c equivalent of 16-800mm. I know, having two cameras sound stupid. But you can see this as another compromise.

-- hide signature --

· (All photos are creative common licensed. Check them out.)
· English is not my native language.

 AlphaTikal's gear list:AlphaTikal's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony a77 II Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM Tamron SP 90mm F2.8 Di VC USD 1:1 Macro (F004) Samsung Galaxy S7 edge +11 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow