Should I get the Canon efs 17 -55?

Started Dec 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
Jonathan Brady Veteran Member • Posts: 5,240
Re: Should I get the Canon efs 17 -55?

bhollis wrote:

I'd recommend you also consider the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8.

I was going to suggest this as well because it's faster, sharper, AND... the 50/1.8 is sharper at f/2.8 than the 17-55 is (I agree that the 50/1.8 is pretty useless wide open most of the time but stopped down it's great - it's just that stopping down kind of defeats the purpose of a fast prime).  So, you may be missing the 36-49mm focal range (the 40mm STM pancake is pretty cheap right now), but overall, you're getting even lower light performance (by 1 and 1/3 stops) and it's sharper.  It's heavier, and a tad longer, and more expensive, but if it's in the budget, it should probably be considered depending on your desire to change lenses.

 Jonathan Brady's gear list:Jonathan Brady's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM +5 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow