This article should be read by everybody

Started Dec 12, 2013 | Discussions thread
artlmntl Senior Member • Posts: 1,804
Re: Both sides have a point.

Allan Olesen wrote:

artlmntl wrote:

Allan Olesen wrote:

If your reply is: "I would not do the same cropping to the low MP photo", then you are not comparing the cameras on equal terms.

Equality is not the issue. It's a matter of purpose.

Well, I suggested that you compared how the cameras performed when used for the same purpose. And you deny to do just that.

So no, for you it is not a question of purpose. It is a question of applying double standards.

If I were using them for the same purpose, I would agree, but I would be using the 24mp to crop more.

Look at it this way: I am perfectly willing to crop my 4912x3264px 16mp picture down to 4000x3000px, and I would do the exact same thing with a 6000x4000px 24mp picture. I don't think there would be a very noticeable difference in IQ, especially at low iso. I know it's not perfectly equal, but sometimes that's the way it is.

-- hide signature --


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow