mistermejia
Veteran Member
- Messages
- 3,180
- Solutions
- 2
- Reaction score
- 650
...Since Fuji grabbed stuff from this camera also. Your thoughts on this?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, similar but different....Since Fuji grabbed stuff from this camera also. Your thoughts on this?
Well, when i woke up this morning all of the sudden i see all these talk about BAD skin tones from the X-E2, so it sounds like it is definitely NOT the same as a X100.No, similar but different....Since Fuji grabbed stuff from this camera also. Your thoughts on this?
Every time Fuji changes the sensor - the film simulations also get changed a little.
Regards
X100 is a 12mp bayer sensor, the others are 16mp X-trans sensors. X100s is same sensor as XE2, XE1 is the same as XPro1.Well, when i woke up this morning all of the sudden i see all these talk about BAD skin tones from the X-E2, so it sounds like it is definitely NOT the same as a X100.No, similar but different....Since Fuji grabbed stuff from this camera also. Your thoughts on this?
Every time Fuji changes the sensor - the film simulations also get changed a little.
Regards
I have always said it, why fix what's NOT broken?!! :-(
Thank you for the clarification. I will wait a bit more to see what Fuji ends up doing with the X-E2 and we'll go from there. I really really wanted the WiFi feature because i will definitely use it, but i woudln't want to sacrifice image over that. Also who wouldn't want better AF, but i also don't do very fast action so that camera might be plenty for meX100 is a 12mp bayer sensor, the others are 16mp X-trans sensors. X100s is same sensor as XE2, XE1 is the same as XPro1.Well, when i woke up this morning all of the sudden i see all these talk about BAD skin tones from the X-E2, so it sounds like it is definitely NOT the same as a X100.No, similar but different....Since Fuji grabbed stuff from this camera also. Your thoughts on this?
Every time Fuji changes the sensor - the film simulations also get changed a little.
Regards
I have always said it, why fix what's NOT broken?!! :-(
But yeah, plenty of comments about skin tones at high ISO with the latest sensors. Glad I am very content with my XE1. I shoot still so no need for imoroved focus, which is rarely a problem at all, especially with the latest upgrades and primes
--
Fuji XE1 w/14, 18-55, 55-200, Rokinon 8mm Fisheye & Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro
X100 is a 12mp bayer sensor, the others are 16mp X-trans sensors. X100s is same sensor as XE2, XE1 is the same as XPro1.Well, when i woke up this morning all of the sudden i see all these talk about BAD skin tones from the X-E2, so it sounds like it is definitely NOT the same as a X100.No, similar but different....Since Fuji grabbed stuff from this camera also. Your thoughts on this?
Every time Fuji changes the sensor - the film simulations also get changed a little.
Regards
I have always said it, why fix what's NOT broken?!! :-(
But yeah, plenty of comments about skin tones at high ISO with the latest sensors. Glad I am very content with my XE1. I shoot still so no need for imoroved focus, which is rarely a problem at all, especially with the latest upgrades and primes
Hi Dannyd12. I have never owned a XE1, that's why i asked which sensor it is. Regarding X cameras i only own the X10 which i really like, except that the iso is not that great.I can't believe what I'm reading here about the X-E2 skin tones! The skin tones are incredible! You're complaining about skin tones at ISO 6400??? Are you kidding me?
I am a professional wedding photographer who has owned and owns countless cameras. The jpegs skin tones from the X-E2 blows away any camera I have ever owned, including the top of the line Canon 5d mark III, which I use for weddings.
Please, stop with the "pasty" skin tone talk at 6400. Your people/family/portrait pictures should be taken at much lower ISO's.
This camera is hands down the best camera I have ever owned. Period.
Nah, it's not the skin tone issue, X-E2 has beautiful skin tones (that may be different to X-E1 and X100, but that's the matter of preference).i guess this XE2 has sensor from 100s, which i have read many posts saying the X100 has better color tones, so maybe the XE2 DOES have skin tone issues, not based on what i am saying, i am only asking, but based on what XE1 owners ad now XE2 owners are saying.
.. You're complaining about skin tones at ISO 6400??? Are you kidding me?
..
+1 (or even +100)Please, stop with the "pasty" skin tone talk at 6400. Your people/family/portrait pictures should be taken at much lower ISO's.
X100 has best skin tones ever. Not beaten by X-100s or x-e2....Since Fuji grabbed stuff from this camera also. Your thoughts on this?
Thank you.
Thanks for responding Dannyd12.Hi Mistemejia,
I can only speak from experience. The skin tones are fine to my eye, not based on a model look. Again, best I have ever experienced. Take a look at sample images from other posts and Flickr and judge for yourself, not by what others say.
I never owned an Xe1 and I believe they are comparing the two cameras. Does it really matter if there is a difference? Not to me! I'm happy with what I see on the xe2. The images are Stunning. The first images I took with this camera I kept saying "wow"! If you don't own the Xe1, get the X-E2 and be happy.