Initial impressions: Fuji X100s vs. Sony RX1

Started Dec 1, 2013 | Discussions thread
km25 Contributing Member • Posts: 675
Re: Initial impressions: Fuji X100s vs. Sony RX1

The RX1 was DOA. It can produce great images, at the cost poor handling. Unless you by the EVF. Now the camera is being done in by Sony it self. The fine CZ F2.0 lens, well why did they not make that lens for the R7s. No they made an 35 F2.8 Sonnar. The reason is that a FF camera that is mirror less size will not be a well balanced tool with anything but slow lens of limited focal lengths. It may very well be that APC is the best sensor size for a well balanced mirror less. Even look at the Micro 3/4 cameras, how well balanced and efective they are. The RX1 was a camera that should have had some kind of viewer (besides it's LCD). Handling is so very important.

-- hide signature --


 km25's gear list:km25's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm X-T2 Leica Elmarit-M 24mm f/2.8 ASPH Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH Leica Summicron-M 50mm f/2 +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow