Pekka Potka's take on the A7R and the EM1

Started Nov 12, 2013 | Discussions thread
Steen Bay Veteran Member • Posts: 6,974
Re: Pekka Potka's take on the A7R and the EM1

blue_skies wrote:

Peng Bian wrote:

Good read. The lens size was something that many who are contemplating the A7 were already aware of.

One thing I found interesting is the low number of sharp shots when using the 1/fl rule for shutter. Thinking it over a bit more I think it makes absolute sense. The 36mp sensor has much more resolving power than almost any other ff, but like the d800, the sheer resolution means the 1/fl rule which works in the days of 10-20mp sensors are no longer sufficient. You need a higher shutter speed for these new high mpx sensors.

That makes no sense. The OM-D (Nex-7 like) has a higher pixel density than the A7r (Nex-6 like) and is therefore more sensitive to camera shake. If anything, you should be able to shoot the A7r at lower shutter speeds than the OM-D.

It's the MP count that matters here, not the pixel size/density. More MPs (higher resolution) makes camera shake more visible.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow