D610 vs. 5D Mark III

Started Nov 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
qianp2k Forum Pro • Posts: 10,350
Re: D610 vs. 5D Mark III

ron purdy wrote:

That's why I asked you try and you didn't even try to process. I am sure in this case D610 by default is better but also will show noises in shadow but just less noise. You need to process.

I will post a 100% cropped photo from that raw to give you an idea.

I appreciate you posting the file. However, this is not a Photoshop contest. My OP is about what these chips are capable of producing on their own.

From the look of it, in terms of ISO 100 noise that is not better than the file I originally posted. (you exposed for the highlights like I did, and the shadows, when lifted, are a wreck.)

I will post a comparable file from the D610 soon.

I have seen D600 and D800 files at base ISO that also show noises in shadow although much less after pushing up before processing. Once processed (and especially if I exposed correctly as this one is a bit underexposed), the difference becomes much smaller.

-- hide signature --

ron purdy dot com

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow