EM1 better than Sony A7(as a System)?

Started Nov 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
Jon Ragnarsson
Jon Ragnarsson Veteran Member • Posts: 5,281
I understand your dilemma...

The A7R especially is almost my dream camera. Big sensor, compact, plenty of resolution, but it is still missing a few compact lenses, and the overall cost of the system goes up fast.

Personally, I have no problem with MF on legacy lenses, and there are some decent lenses out there:


But the question is, are they good enough? Even "low resolution" FF camera like the Canon 5Diii with it's relatively low 22MP sensor needs a very sharp glass to make full use of all that pixels you need really sharp glass. I didn't believe it until I saw a side-by-side comparison of 24-70L and Zeiss 24mm prime. 5D really needed every sharpness it could get.

So my lust for the A7R has cooled down a little bit, at least until I see some real lens test. Besides, 16MP gos a long way, actually.

But yes, Sony did fill a huge gap in the market with those cameras.

P.S.  But as a whole system, the E-M1 is much better. It pretty much has everything you could need. Even G-M1 as a pocket backup...

-- hide signature --
 Jon Ragnarsson's gear list:Jon Ragnarsson's gear list
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow