X-Trans for commercial work

Started Nov 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
abelits Contributing Member • Posts: 773
Re: X-Trans for commercial work

Najinsky wrote:

abelits wrote:

Najinsky wrote:

X-Trans artefacts?

You mean, ones that can be only reproduced on obsolete version of DCRaw and Adobe converters?

No, I mean the very real artefacts that are still visible in the latest raw converters, like Lightroom 5.2 and Aperture 3.5.

The recommended converter is Silkypix. There are others that are about as good. Adobe is consistently the worst for X-Trans, though the amount of awfulness varies.

The existence of the artefacts is not a question for debate,

Oh yes, it is!

they are real and viewable my anybody who takes the time to download samples and view them in various raw converters:

Then don't use converters that produce them, or find the settings that cause no artefacts. The sample images are made for reference only, they do not reflect optimal processing.

 abelits's gear list:abelits's gear list
Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS +16 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow