The worst thing about the DF is the Disappointment

Started Nov 9, 2013 | Discussions thread
marike6 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,088
Without using it, who knows how close or not close Nikon came

David314 wrote:

Kodachrome200 wrote:

So lots of folks have been calling the retro DF ill conceived but I dont think that is true. I think it was a staggeringly good idea they just forgot to include anything good about the idea in the actual camera.

What is disappointing to me is how brilliant the idea is and how close nikon came to a great camera but didn't

it is like your team making it to the championship and losing by one point from an obvious mistake, it hurts more

mounting old nikon glass and pairing it with the d4 sensor? Brilliant

not improving the focus aid, with at least >*< becoming >>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<< argh

Perhaps until you try to manually focus with AI Nikkors on the Df, you won't know how easy or difficult it is.

a fusion design with dial for ISO brilliant - putting the ISO and exposure comp on left argh

Unless people have really long thumbs, it doesn't seem like reaching a right side ISO dial would be possible.  In that case, it seems to make more sense on the left as all you have to do is remove your left hand from supporting the lens and change ISO which can be achieved while looking through the VF.

the one stop shutter speed dial should have been removed and this is what the top should look like for a fusion camera

The price is what it is but it is disappointingly high compared with the d800, especially in europe

the rumor of a sub $2k dslr was very exciting and a stripped down less expensive version would have been better received

2fps, 9 point af, spot meter only, no hdmi, no usb, no side connections, fewer body buttons, no top lcd, no flash sync out, 36 frame buffer $1750 us

and the in you hands campaign very well done and then the kit lens doesn't have an aperture ring?

So you don't care if they remove the shutter speed dial but the fact that the kit lens doesn't have an aperture ring is a big deal?  Why would Nikon totally redesign AF Nikkors like the 50 f/1.8G when there are tons of AI Nikkors already in production for users who prefer manual aperture lenses?  Sounds like a bit of a waste of resources to redesign or make a whole set of manual aperture, AF Nikkors.  But perhaps that is something Nikon is planning.  We don't know.

But I do have to wonder why some are so willing to write off this camera as a "poor implementation" without shooting with it?  Obviously the Df is a bit of a fusion of a modern AF DSLR with a manual SLR.  But isn't it better for Nikon to produce a camera with more widespread appeal than a more niche all manual camera with center weighted metering and a split prism finder?

 marike6's gear list:marike6's gear list
Nikon Coolpix P330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow