FF Commentary by Thom

Started Nov 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
KL Matt Veteran Member • Posts: 5,885
Re: My Summary

Ontario Gone wrote:

KL Matt wrote:

Other than a better lens selection, broader dynamic range, greater color depth, higher resolution, and greater control over depth of field, there is absolutely no reason to purchase a full frame camera in this day and age. I have no idea what all the fuss is about.

^I am KL MATT and I DO NOT approve of this message!!!!

^The winking smiley means I'M NOT SERIOUS ABOUT THE ABOVE! And, it's what Thom Hogan said, NOT ME!!! AAAARRRTTGADGGDSADFfdjsalkjzx.,


-- hide signature --

... interested in .... photographs? Heh? Know what a mean? Photographs? (He asked him knowingly). Nudge nudge, snap snap, grin grin, wink wink, say no more, say no more, know what a' mean? Know what a' mean?

What is interesting is when we start asking different questions, like, why stop at FF? If bigger means better, why not go for MF? That question kind of takes the wind out of the whole argument, bc it shows the question isn't about "better" it's about standards vs price. Everybody has a "good enough" level of expectation, and for some, apsc is good enough. For others, MF is the smallest they will accept.

Pentax is busy making cameras for people who think apsc is good enough for their needs, and at the right price. And I refute your better lens selection point,

OMG OMG OMG I'm gonna freak out right here on the Internet!

WHOSE better lens selection "point"? You can't POSSIBLY be referring to me, KL Matt, could you? Because it is NOT MY POINT! IT'S THOM HOGAN'S STUPID AND MOSTLY WRONG POINT!

Sorry to yell but a significant portion of this forum appears to be irony-deaf. I thought it might aid comprehension.


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow