Why DX mirrorless will replace FX DSLR (for most photographers)

Started Nov 3, 2013 | Discussions thread
wildlifr
wildlifr Senior Member • Posts: 1,626
Re: None
2

Mako2011 wrote:

wildlifr wrote:

50% reach outweighs the light gathering advantage of FX IMO, which, as I said, is why I don't switch. I'm completely unconcerned with why other people choose the system they choose.

Have you shot telephoto side by side FF vs APS-C and compared (like sensors)? Just curious

Don't forget with sensors of the same pixel demsity...if a full sized image from FF is cropped so that it produces the same field of view as a full sized image from APS, the full sized image from APS will be the same size as the cropped image from FF. Therefore, there is no "telephoto advantage" or "pixel density advantage" in favour of APS. There are other advantages though.

No I haven't shot side by side. But they don't make a FF with the pixel density of a D7100.

 wildlifr's gear list:wildlifr's gear list
Nikon D7100 Nikon D750 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D ED-IF Nikon AF-S Teleconverter TC-14E II +11 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
WD
WD
MOD Mako2011
WD
WD
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
WD
WD
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow