Part II: Nikon wasting time & resources on a BS retro camera

Started Oct 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
Kerry Pierce
MOD Kerry Pierce Forum Pro • Posts: 19,757
Re: Your post illustrates the d400/et all problem very well.

Stacey_K wrote:

Kerry Pierce wrote:

If they don't continue to offer TOL DX cameras with pro features like the d300, then there is no reason to bother with pro level DX lenses.

That's what I said They haven't bothered with them.

But, you haven't made the case that more pro level DX lenses are necessary to ensure the future viability of a pro level DX camera system.

I am certainly not saying that Nikon shouldn't make pro DX glass, because I don't believe that to be the right thing to do.  Indeed, I've often called for f/2 pro level DX lenses in the past. But, I don't think that the lack of more pro level DX lenses hurts the pro level DX cameras at all.


-- hide signature --

my gallery of so-so photos

 Kerry Pierce's gear list:Kerry Pierce's gear list
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D Nikon AF Nikkor 105mm f/2D DC Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC +17 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow