ISOless sensors, read noise and photography - many questions!

Started Oct 3, 2013 | Discussions thread
RussellInCincinnati Veteran Member • Posts: 3,201
quit trying to avoid taking credit for useful thread

boardsy: I'd still wonder about ""the same" or better results by post-processing an image from a camera set to ISO 800" - if the same, why bother?

Because (a) no more bracketing (b) never a blown highlight, highlights always visually top priority if you don't want your photos to look like unfinished artworks (c) simplification of always using ISO 800 when the light's bad, no matter exactly how bad it is. One less field decision that could result in a screwup if you set a real high ISO and then forgot to reset it later. Which mistake have done approximately one zillion times. (d) Am wagering if you're using a camera known to your raw processing software, the raw processing software can push the data (beyond the minimum read noise ISO such as Nex C3 ISO 800) with more computational resources and customizability than camera firmware. Am thinking here about RawTherapee working with all 64-bit numbers when extracting the last bit of highlight detail, all the work put into Lightroom etc. (e) this is getting real unimportant but it is psychologically less stressful knowing that you're using your sensor at the 4%-or-whatever-better minimum read noise setting, rather than the most-perfect-EVF-preview setting.

Ordinary interior light, quite small F-stop for perfect clarity throughout scene depth. ISO 800 didn't cut it for 1/6th second exposure, needed ISO 3200 or so. But left cam at ISO 800 and moved an exposure slider in raw post-processing software. Feels like the only low-stress, no-bracketing file clutter, infinite-highlight-detail way to fly now.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow