Why is the SLT-A58 so cheap, any obvious reasons?

Started Oct 17, 2013 | Questions thread
Draek Senior Member • Posts: 2,028
Re: Why is the SLT-A58 so cheap, any obvious reasons?

Because it's an entry-level camera, and those things depreciate faster than you can say "new models! shiny!".

Same thing happened with the A390 and the A33, likewise with the A37, and the A35 seemingly avoided it purely because it was almost permanently out-of-stock (likely too few units imported by Sony, though, as I've yet to see one in the field). Even with other brands -- go take a look which prices a Nikon D3200, nevermind the D3100, goes for nowadays. I'm betting the same goes for Canon, but I got kinda lost in their numbering scheme after the 350D.

Hell, even in other market segments -- my EX1 was the first and likely last premium compact I buy, since these days Samsung is only steps away from giving away the cheaper NX kits with my cereal. In fact, it's kind of weird when I could get a NX1000 plus 18-55 kit lens plus 55-200 tele-zoom all for the price of a single Galaxy S4, with cash to spare.

 Draek's gear list:Draek's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR Samsung TL500 Canon PowerShot A1200 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow