A7/A7r sketch on SAR

Started Oct 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
joger Veteran Member • Posts: 4,900
Re: A7/A7r sketch on SAR

parallaxproblem wrote:

joger wrote:

parallaxproblem wrote:

I bought my first X700 in 1991 (to replace an almost identical, stolen XG-M bought in 1985) and liked both the camera and the styling very much at the time (and would have liked a Nikon F3 even more), however it seems a bit sad that 22 (or 28) years later we have to stop looking to the future and start looking at the past. Why did people suddenly start getting so fearful of the future?

how does the outline design of the camera body relate to your photography possibilities?

Good question

I would say because the exterior design of a camera expresses the design concept of the whole camera

well - room for more processing power and more room for a larger battery - very nice!!

Therefore when there is a major change in exterior design it suggests that the 'internals' or at least the way they are implemented have changed significantly as well (yes, I'm an engineer and I know they all come from the standard parts bin, but I'm talking 'holistically' if you will excuse my pretention)

it's all electronics - who care's how it looks from the inside - it is not a car - but even there I am not interested in the looks of the engine - at my sports car I even can't see the engine any more - no problem at all - as long as it sounds and rives well

Who cares if there is a know or a button her and there as long as the images that come out are fantastic?

I never liked the NEX design

That's the difference between us. I liked the NEX-5 straight off and was very happy with it as a 'travel-friendly' alternative to my hulking DSLR, and I loved all the high-tech JPEG processing toys that came with it (HDR, HHHT, picture effects etc etc)

This new camera appears to be a far more standard affair. I understand its appeal (and part of me likes it as well) but it is sad to lose the unique 'NEX' qualities

I never liked it but it never influenced my wish whether I#d buy it r not - it just had a too smal sensor for my taste - the bigger the sensor the better - 35 mm equivalent is already a compromise I seldom accept - that's why I almost purely use shift lenses and recombine four shots for one shot to have virtually bigger sensor size

but I would have accepted it if there were a FF sensor in it with >> 30 Mpixel - if fact I couldn't be less influenced by the outside look of a camera - yet I have to say that I really like my Plaubel:

that's a masterpiece in design - form follow function

but I understand that the smaller is better faction is now very unhappy - but a bit bigger is always good IMHO

That's where we really have to diverge. I'm sick of 'big'

the A7R does not look big - it is just a bit bigger - stil a small camera and it has a FF sensor which forced them to have a bigger mount - fine with me - it is smaller then any other FF body - so it is small

I would say that the Plaubel even looks more futuristic then any NEX ever

Are, now that's were we might well agree

and I almost never use it since I have the 5D II - fully tilted and stitched results rival in image quality with my scanned 5x7 slides and the running price is lower

-- hide signature --

isn’t it funny, a ship that leaks from the top
ISO 9000 definition of quality: 'Degree to which a set of inherent characteristic fulfills requirements'
I am the classic “Windows by Day, Mac by Night user'
“The horizon of many people is a circle with zero radius which they call their point of view.” Albert Einstein
don't feed trolls - ignore them

 joger's gear list:joger's gear list
Leica APO-Telyt-M 135mm f/3.4 ASPH Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Sony FE 85mm F1.4 GM Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA Sony FE 12-24mm F4 +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow