Is the Nikon 16-35 f4 significantly better than the 18-105 for a DX

Started Sep 15, 2013 | Questions thread
romfordbluenose Senior Member • Posts: 2,797
Re: No, 16-35 doesn't make sense on DX. Get Nikon 10-24 DX for landscapes.

I used a Sigma 10-20 before I moved to the D800. Good enough for me and only sold it because I changed cameras.

 romfordbluenose's gear list:romfordbluenose's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 Nikon D800 Nikon D5300 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR +11 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow