boggis the cat wrote:
I would like to share some infos with you about another big lobbygroup, Eisenhower named them MIC. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfnHZiMdop4
We know that the oil/gasindustry, wallstreet, monsanto can directly influence the legislative but who are the lobbiists from the military industry complex?
I have heard of one group at first after 9/11, the second time as i was surching more infos about Snowden and the last as i was reading an articel about „Elysium“. It´s one word that makes this movie more interesting, so have a short read if you haven´t heard anything about it. http://variety.com/2013/film/reviews/film-review-elysium-1200569714/
The story is not so far away from the reality, but coming back to the MIC.
If you didn´t noticed the keyword, you will hear it at the end of this short video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xcbi5SH27c
The second part with more information about this group.
Read the entire wikiarticel and followup at least the links to United Defense and BoozAllenHamilton for more information.
So what do you think, had Eisenhower such a group in mind and was he right? Or is this only a conspirancytheory?
(If this group is well known, sorry if i have stolen your time. But i thought it could be interesting.)
One point that you may be overlooking that is, I think, extremely important. Eisenhower originally used the term "military industrial congressional complex". He was pressured (or convinced, if you prefer) to remove "congressional".
You are right and thank you for this clarification. I missed the "congressional".. and thought Eisenhower meant also private buisnesses like Carlyle Group that could direct influence the congress and the president.
Eisenhower watched the MIC develop for the war effort then rapidly grow out of control, subsuming rational national interests of the USA at a political and industrial level. This is a nation that was once against having a standing army (a professional military) and is now almost entirely consumed by the war industry.
(Subtract 'financial services' from the GNP to get the real economy, then look at how much of the real economy is geared to war. The USA outspends every other nation combined in military expenditure largely due to a simple fact: what other industry is there?)
Yes, the rest is well known.
|Post (hide subjects)||Posted by||When|
|Sep 10, 2013||2|
|Sep 11, 2013|
|Sep 11, 2013|
|Sep 12, 2013|
|Sep 12, 2013|
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sadiqur_Rahman by Sadiqur Rahman|
from Ain't Going to Work on Maggie's Farm no More
|Airborne by John Beavin|
from - How to respect the Flag and Anthem - (Portrait in Full Colours + A Border)