Rx100 rx100ii

Started Sep 6, 2013 | Discussions thread
zoranT Contributing Member • Posts: 915
Re: Rx100 rx100ii

newellj wrote:

Better high ISO performance has been demonstrated by everyone and questioned by no one -

no one? Really? Laughable, better high iso performance of the RX100 ii is a debunked myth

"Better noise reduction in JPEG and crushed blacks is not what I call improved low light performance!"

or take RAW, where there is literally no difference between both cameras

"zero evidence of improved low light performance in the raw stills direct off the sensor. Opening the files with Adobe Camera Raw from the RX100 and RX100M2 shot at identical settings (ISO 3200, F5.6, 1/200) the black levels are lower in the RX100 Mark II shot before you make any adjustments. That hides some of the noise in the blacks but the overall exposure seems darker, causing you to shoot at a higher ISO or lift the shadows in Photoshop – possibly creating more noise. As you can see, noise levels are the same in both shots so I am not too impressed by Sony’s claims that the RX100 Mark II is better in low light than it’s predecessor."


Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow