That RAW Troublemaker Again With Files

Started Sep 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
Alan_S Senior Member • Posts: 1,834
Re: ok, I gave 833 a shot...

Gary Eickmeier wrote:

Alan_S wrote:

Gary Eickmeier wrote:

Gary Eickmeier wrote:! Forehead slap! NOW you're talking! Try this:

First your in-cam jpg (isn't this the one you started that entire other thread on, showing it was "better" than processed from RAW?):

...followed by results after a few seconds of basic slider adjustments in ACR:

which once again demonstrates why I don't waste card space on in-cam JPGs, even with casual snapshots like this one (if nothing else, look at the detail gained in the clouds!). As "good" as in-cam processing may be, I've always seen better results processing to my own liking.

Are you comparing your processed image with my unprocessed one?

Not sure I understand your question (all JPGs have been processed, either by the camera or separately, from RAW)... you posted your RAW and your JPG files of 833, I downloaded both. The bottom image above is derived from your RAW file, which I processed in ACR. The top image is your JPG, untouched by me (it was derived from the same RAW file and processed on your end, either by you or your camera).

-- hide signature --

- AlanS

 Alan_S's gear list:Alan_S's gear list
Sony a99 II Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G Sony 16-35mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Sony 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM II +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow