M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX

Started Aug 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
SirSeth Veteran Member • Posts: 9,910
Re: Entry vs. Enthusiast

walkaround wrote:

SirSeth wrote:

You could also ding Fuji for being way overpriced compared to the A3000 also. I mean they might not pack the MP or something else that doesn't measure up, but man have you seen or felt the quality? They are going after a totally different market and they ooze quality.

I'm sorry but Fuji cameras do not "ooze quality" to me. They feel like hollow plastic, and when I hold one I can't believe it costs $1000. Much like the E-P5.

Interesting. I had the opposite reaction. Is it the lightness of a camera that turns you off? I have a Pentax Q (original) that is heafty feeling for it's size.



The only place in the market I see build quality, performance, and price coinciding is at the $500 price point, regardless of brand.

-- hide signature --

What if the hokey pokey really is what it's all about?

 SirSeth's gear list:SirSeth's gear list
Olympus E-1 Sony Alpha a7 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Olympus Zuiko Digital 11-22mm 1:2.8-3.5 Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 OSS +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow