M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX

Started Aug 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
goshigoo Contributing Member • Posts: 779
Re: M43 seems more and more overpriced compared to NEX

peevee1 wrote:

Dennis wrote:

If you want to extend the argument, then it's fair to point out that NEX has nothing at all to compete with the excellent and fairly priced 45/1.8 and 75/1.8

No, 75/1.8 is NOT fairly priced, you can get plenty 85/1.8 covering twice the image circle at less than half the price. It is in fact one of the most overpriced m43 lenses, along with 12/2 and Pana 12-35 and 35-100 pair, at least at their prices on the US market.

Totally agree on this; any m43 lens that are over 700 USD are definitely overpriced (12,12-35,35-100,7-14,75...)
but there are still many good lenses for us to choose (14,17,20,25,45 f/1.8, 100-300, 9-18, 14-42 II, 45-175, etc.)

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow