Wedding Gear Question

Started Jun 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
dodgebaena Regular Member • Posts: 342
Re: Wedding Gear Question

brokensocialscenester wrote:

Michael Thomas Mitchell wrote:

I have to question the "2 per month" and "200 total" claim. If she were working EVERY month of the year, those figures would represent more than eight years in the business. That's a LONG time to be doing this as a hobby. And yet her approach doesn't exactly suggest that she's getting high dollar. So, understanding possible backlash from others, I'm calling BS on her claims. It just doesn't add up. In the end, what matters most are results. I hope you will eventually be able to see some for yourself. Then you'll know if she's the real deal or not.

This bears repeating.

-- hide signature --

I have the same thoughts as above. F2.8 lenses are a must, at least for 24-70 and 70-200. There is just no way to capture the ambient light in most churches and reception areas with anything slower, and shallow depth of field is a must for the formals and portraits (85f1.4, 50f1.4 are almost musts).

But then again, there's a market for anything.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow