For 22mm shooters: Is the 18-55 worth adding?

Started Jul 31, 2013 | Discussions thread
Jostian
Jostian Veteran Member • Posts: 3,247
Re: Ooops: Correction

Tonkotsu Ramen wrote:

gail wrote:

I was trying to say that I don't consider the EOS-M that small even with the 22mm lens. Personally, it does not serve as a replacement for my S100, carry-at-all-times camera. The M is certainly much easier to carry around than my DSLR (which I sold) but I take it with me purposefully, when I know I have something special to photograph.

True! The S100 is about 1/2 of the thickness of the EOS-M+22mm lens, it is a truly pocketable camera, whereas the EOS-M is really only small enough to fit in large pockets (cargo pockets, jacket pockets). If you're able to (easily) carry the bulk of a EOS-M w/ the 22mm, then the 18-55 shouldn't be an issue.

yip, agree, not quite as pocketable as I'd like.

-- hide signature --

Jostian

 Jostian's gear list:Jostian's gear list
Nikon D500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Tamron SP 24-70mm F2.8 Di VC USD Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-140mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR Tamron 15-30mm F2.8 +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow