why has the 16mm f2.8 got such a bad rep?

Started Jul 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Dohmnuill Contributing Member • Posts: 742
Re: why has the 16mm f2.8 got such a bad rep?
1

tomtom50 wrote:


Contrast dives to zero in the corners. It isn't just sample variation.

It's even less just outside the corners..   

Who gives a tinker's cuss about the extreme corners. Practical results from the field count and when it's difficult to immediately differentiate the 16mm shot from something ten or twenty times the cost it's not doing too badly.

I use Leica and C Voigtlander lenses with the N-7, and the 16mm (plus various Nikkors and an Industar 50). If it was ordinary or worse, I'd ditch it straight away. But it's not.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow