Wondering why DPReview ignored the M

Started Jul 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
Tonkotsu Ramen
Tonkotsu Ramen Senior Member • Posts: 2,380
Re: Wondering why DPReview ignored the M

zapatista wrote:

Tonkotsu Ramen wrote:

gmcooper wrote:

I wonder why they never considered the M good enough to devote resources to reviewing it. One year later it appears to be among the cameras attracting the most interest.

The reason they didn't review it is:

"we base our decisions partly on the feedback emails we get , partly on the popularity of each camera on the site, and partly by reading the forums."

Even with that said, the EOS-M, despite it's poor market performance, deserves a review based just upon the fact that it was Canon's first entry into the growing ILC market.

Well, you're entitled to your opinion. The EOS M has been reviewed by most other places, some more than one time (pre/post-firmware update). What is it exactly you might be missing in order to make an informed decision about the camera. It's all out there.

This is a thread discussing why the camera hasn't been reviewed by this website, not a thread discussing why I should go on other websites to read reviews.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow