Wondering why DPReview ignored the M

Started Jul 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
zapatista Regular Member • Posts: 250
Re: Wondering why DPReview ignored the M

Tonkotsu Ramen wrote:

gmcooper wrote:

I wonder why they never considered the M good enough to devote resources to reviewing it. One year later it appears to be among the cameras attracting the most interest.

The reason they didn't review it is:

"we base our decisions partly on the feedback emails we get , partly on the popularity of each camera on the site, and partly by reading the forums."

Even with that said, the EOS-M, despite it's poor market performance, deserves a review based just upon the fact that it was Canon's first entry into the growing ILC market.

Well, you're entitled to your opinion. The EOS M has been reviewed by most other places, some more than one time (pre/post-firmware update). What is it exactly you might be missing in order to make an informed decision about the camera. It's all out there.

 zapatista's gear list:zapatista's gear list
Sony a6000 Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow