OK - let's see if I can follow what you're saying....
...You see, you post in bits and pieces, meaning like incomplete thoughts, so trying to figure out what you're trying to say is a bit difficult.
I think you were asking about the EOS-M picture quality, if I'm not mistaken (correct me here). OK, previously I had never even considered getting the EOS-M. After all, weren't there enough mirrorless cameras on the market! But then I saw a few photos - taken by some pros that had me turning my head also. So I went to the local Mom and Pop camera store (yes, they still have a few of 'em left) and started playing with it. Well, I was hooked, so I picked one up. At the time the AF was a bit slow, but Canon's latest firmware update 2.02 really fixed all of that...and then some.
It's hard to imagine a camera that small with a DSLR-sized 18 MP sensor in it. The kit 18-55 lens is built like a tank (all metal) and has superb optics (well, at least my copy). The color tonality of that camera is typical Canon - that is rich with a nice tonality. High ISO capabilities are nice also. I'm glad that I picked it up and it was a welcomed addition to my collection. I strongly suggest to anyone (now-a-days) that if you can still find them at the blow-out prices (check Amazon, Adorama, or B&H) where they sell the EOS-M with 22 MM prime for only $299, or the EOS-M with 18-55 zoom for $349 - to jump on it without second thought. At those prices, this photographic instrument with optics is a masterpiece - a steal, really.
As I mentioned in an earlier reply, I can take just about any camera and get very good results with it. You just have to learn the camera - it's strengths and weaknesses, and then work to their favor. So I'm delighted with all that I currently have. And I'm certainly looking forward to adding the NX300 (which I ordered yesterday).
-- hide signature --
Have a great one....
Bernd (Ben) W. Herrmann
North Carolina, USA
link