7D - 70D - 7D2

Started Jul 21, 2013 | Discussions thread
bobn2
bobn2 Forum Pro • Posts: 63,548
Re: Tic Tac Toe
1

howardroark wrote:

Karl Gnter Wnsch wrote:

Bobn2 wrote:

As for 'important areas' where it doesn't not come close, that is arguable.

No it's not. The 100% viewfinder for example is a must in a replacement for the 7DII!

You can't win. No logic is going to work.

Logic might work. A non sequitur like the above certainly won't.

The 7D came out and then a few month later the 60D came out. Is that not enough to argue the point that the 7D was built for reason?

Certainly there was a reason and a strategy then, in particular the D300, which was selling well and for which Canon needed a competitive offering. Haven't seen a D400.

They......don't......get......it. Won't get it. Can't get it. Reality and history are what they are, yet these guys deny it. Do you not see how futile it is to argue with people who don't even recognize reality?

Which 'reality' are we talking about? Can you point to the 'reality' of Canon's press release announcing the 7D Mark II. Until then your 'realty' is just supposition.

-- hide signature --

Bob

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MOD elfroggio
MOD elfroggio
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD elfroggio
MOD elfroggio
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow