Any mft's shooters thinking of jumping ship for FF nex

Started Jul 22, 2013 | Discussions thread
Thorgrem Contributing Member • Posts: 565
Re: Only if the lenses were as small as in m4/3

EEmu wrote:

I converted the m43 lenses to FF equivalents in the above.

You did it a little bit wrong.

Let me help.

  • Panasonic 12-35 f/2.8 (24-70 f2.8) 999,- euro 6.76 cm x 7.38 cm 305 gram
  • Canon 24-70 f/2.8 IS 1999,- euro 8.85 cm x 11.3 cm 805 gram
  • Panasonic 35-100 f/2.8 (70-200 f/2.8) 1069,- euro 6,86 cm x 9,91 cm 360 gram
  • Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS 2199,- euro 8.9 cm x 19.9 cm 1490 gram

So m4/3 lenses can be a lot smaller than ff lenses. Maybe their can be some miniaturization with a mirrorless ff but I think m4/3 will always be more compact.

 Thorgrem's gear list:Thorgrem's gear list
Olympus E-M5 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm 1:2.8 Macro Olympus 12-40mm F2.8
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow