As an avid m4/3 (and other ILC) user, let me chime in here....

Started Jul 12, 2013 | Discussions thread
ptox Regular Member • Posts: 223
Zero credibility

marike6 wrote:

Just Having Fun wrote:

The EOS M system still has a long way to go. It has few native lenses, lacks accessories, and it is still behind in what the camera can do (compare vs. a NEX or even the EM5 on DxO). On top of that it is very stripped down in terms of features (for example NEX offers 10fps and EM5 offers 9fps). Focus speed after the FW update is still nowhere near Panasonic or Olympus too.

IQ-wise, in spite of what DxOMark sensor ratings say, I think the EOS M (and all the 18 mp Canons) produce better looking images than the EM5.

When are m43 fans going to get over this lie that the EM5 has dramatically better IQ than the 18 mp Canons. Because DxOMark sensor ratings has the EM5 a mere 5 points ahead of the Canon 18 mp cameras (a 5 year old sensor).

Why the obsession with this topic? Most people have the opposite opinion, and yet here you are again... it's as though you've got some kind of radar.

Anyway, the point is not that the EM5 sensor is "dramatically better" than the EOS-M's; it's that it's better at all, which is contrary to the OP's original claim. And yours.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow