As an avid m4/3 (and other ILC) user, let me chime in here....

Started Jul 12, 2013 | Discussions thread
SunnyFlorida Contributing Member • Posts: 831
Re: Simply not true.....
3

AdamT wrote:

as soon as I saw ""DXO mark"" mentioned I stopped reading your last post.....

I found the OMD to be a fantastically sharp camera in RAW with a superb JPG engine but neither the DR nor high ISOs to match the Canon 18Mp sensor let alone the Sony and Toshiba ones in the latest Nikons and Fujis

-- hide signature --

** Please ignore the Typos, I'm the world's worst Typist **

I've been shooting with the M for the last two days, using the 22mm F/2.0 and it's a nice camera, but the sensor is definitely average for APS-C, and definitely behind the OMD-5, if anything I think the DxO ratings are a bit generous in the M's favor, however, considering the price of $299 including the F/2.0 lens it's an absolute bargain and I would recommend it based on overall value since it's not worth spending double or triple on the OMD-5 to get the little bit of extra performance.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow