D7100 - Wildlife Digital Art (not everyone's cup of tea)

Started Jul 7, 2013 | Discussions thread
TFergus
TFergus Veteran Member • Posts: 6,188
Re: So, true photography isn't art Rudy?

RudyPohl wrote:

JimPearce wrote:

And if you paste an image on a fake background it is art? I'm not sure where you're going with this one. I think I'd have to go with Ovid here: "Ars est celare artem — It is true art to conceal art."

I respond in fear and trembling about continuing this thread but what the heck... of course true photography is real art, yes. yes yes!

What I was trying to say was that it is not true photography when you take that bird, and put another real-life photographed background underneath it - the result is not true photography. In order words, if your were to take a Heron shot at Mud Lake (with presumably with a crappy background) and go and photograph another background (one more flattering), or worse, steal one off the web, and then place that new background under the bird. This "untrue" photography would be made a hundred times worse if you didn't disclose what you did and let people think you shot a great bird in a great setting and you did a great job on creating a photo.

However, if you cut out the bird and paste it on top off some kind of background that is clearly some kind of digitally-created artwork that anyone viewing it could tell immediately that you are not holding this up to be a real photographed creation. I looked at a few covers of wildlife magazines today regarding this and some have issues where the animal, like a moose has been removed from his natural background in Photoshop and has been incorporated into the cover design of that issue. That cover clearly isn't a photograph although it contains a photographic element.

Anyway, that's my 2 cents..

I ask my question again:

What is the difference between your 2 photos if you simply blurred the "real" background until it was indistinguishable ?

Nothing.  So you have to decide at which point does blurring the background suddenly turn it "fake"... if you care enough.  Thing is, you shouldn't care, you should just make images you like.

Read the quote Edispics posted. It's perfect.

Whatever happened to the days when people just tried to make nice looking images and didn't politicize it with words like "true" or "fake" or "real".

Art is art. It doesn't matter how it gets there.

However, if "true photography" is your ambition... you need to figure out a way to print true RAWs, without processing them.  And good luck with that.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
GPW
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow