Why is my NEX not as good as RX100 or even LX5?

Started Jun 25, 2013 | Discussions thread
telefunk OP Contributing Member • Posts: 789
Re: Why is my NEX not as good as RX100 or even LX5?

Thank you all so much for all your answers and suggestions. DPReview did not alert me to all your posts. So to answer some of your question:

All shots were taken from the same spot, all at 24 equiv mm at f4, 100iso.

The reason I have these (as you mentioned "bad") lenses, is that I always shoot wide. I like the very wide effect. Even my wife's RX100 si not wide enough, and so it did have the advantage of being slightly more zoomed in.

I agree, the Nex 3n image is better than the LX5, but by a very small margin. Certainly not justifying the NEX claim to DSLR-like results.

So, how could I find vintage legacy glass for my Nex that is 24mm equiv, meaning 16mm for the Nex????? Other than fisheye of course.

 telefunk's gear list:telefunk's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 Casio EX-ZR5000 808 +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow