DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

70-200 2.8 IS II vs. 85 1.2 II for Portraits?

Started Jun 29, 2013 | Discussions thread
Fog Maker Senior Member • Posts: 2,733
Re: 70-200 2.8 IS II vs. 85 1.2 II for Portraits?

Press Correspondent wrote:

Fog Maker wrote:

ok55 wrote:

I wouldn't consider a 70-200 a replacement for the 85L. The blur at 200mm f2.8 might be pretty similar to the 85L two stops wider but the perspective is totally different. The,greater depth in the 85 image coupled with the blur makes all the difference & can be very addictive.

I don't think Canon's in any great hurry to replace the 85L so I'd say go ahead and buy it.
Brgds

If they however update it they will run into some serious pricing issues-

for a non super tele - where its now is the absolute limit

The price on the 5D III has dropped almost 500 Euro in a year

which should be a good indicator that Canon can't keep up this madness

Canon knows no limits Get ready for a rude awakening once the new lens arrives

True lol

 Fog Maker's gear list:Fog Maker's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 85mm F1.2L II USM Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
fad
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow