Still Trying to Convince Myself on RAW

Started Jun 29, 2013 | Photos thread
RedFox88 Forum Pro • Posts: 28,164
Wow, you like the JPG better?

Wow, you like the JPG better from what you posted?

I view the full size of the JPG to have a lot of detail smearing, aka noise reduction/removal.  The RAW file, clearly converted with only default settings which is why it looks so "weak", has more details, clearly.  And I don't see any "noise" in the RAW file converted to JPG, what I see is where noise was removed but it did not smear the detail like the camera JPG did.

Once you understand how to develop RAW files, you will shake your head ever thinking the camera JPG at ISO 6400 was better than you developing the RAW file. And once you learn how to do it, it will not take much time at all because you can copy settings from one image to another.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow